Energy storage systems are extremely large in scale, and there are significant differences between centralized battery management systems and energy storage battery management systems. Here, we will only compare them with distributed battery management systems for power batteries.
1. The battery and its management system occupy different positions within their respective systems.
In an energy storage system, the energy storage battery only interacts with the energy storage converter at high voltage. The converter draws power from the AC grid to charge the battery pack; or the battery pack supplies power to the converter, and the electrical energy is converted into AC and sent to the AC grid through the converter.
In energy storage systems, the battery management system (BMS) primarily interacts with the inverter and the energy storage power station's dispatch system. On one hand, the BMS sends crucial status information to the inverter to determine the high-voltage power interaction status; on the other hand, the BMS sends comprehensive monitoring information to the energy storage power station's dispatch system (PCS).
The BMS of an electric vehicle has energy exchange relationships with the electric motor and the charger at high voltage; in terms of communication, it exchanges information with the charger during the charging process; and throughout the entire application process, it has the most detailed information exchange with the vehicle controller.
2. Different hardware logic structures
The hardware of energy storage management systems generally adopts a two- or three-layer model, with larger-scale systems tending to use a three-layer management system.
Battery management systems (BMS) typically have only one layer (centralized) or two layers (distributed); three-layer systems are rare. Small cars primarily use a single-layer centralized BMS. A two-layer distributed BMS is shown in the diagram below.
Functionally, the first and second layers of the energy storage battery management system are essentially equivalent to the first-layer data acquisition module and the second-layer main control module of a power battery. The third layer of the energy storage battery management system is an additional layer built upon this foundation to handle the massive scale of energy storage batteries.
3. The communication protocols are different.
The communication between the energy storage battery management system and its internal systems mainly uses the CAN protocol, but its communication with the external system, which mainly refers to the energy storage power station dispatch system (PCS), often uses the TCP/IP protocol.
The power battery, in the context of electric vehicles, all adopt the CAN protocol, but they are distinguished by the fact that the internal CAN is used between the components inside the battery pack, while the vehicle CAN is used between the battery pack and the whole vehicle.
4. The management system parameters vary significantly depending on the type of battery cells used in the energy storage power station.
For safety and economic reasons, energy storage power stations often choose lithium iron phosphate batteries, while some even use lead-acid or lead-carbon batteries. The mainstream battery types for electric vehicles are currently lithium iron phosphate batteries and ternary lithium batteries.
Different battery types have vastly different external characteristics, making battery models completely incompatible. Furthermore, the battery management system and cell parameters must have a one-to-one correspondence. Even for the same type of cell from different manufacturers, the detailed parameter settings will not be the same.
5. Different threshold setting preferences
Energy storage power stations generally have ample space to accommodate a large number of batteries. However, some stations are located in remote areas with difficult transportation, making large-scale battery replacement challenging. Energy storage power stations prioritize long-lasting battery cells to prevent failures. Therefore, their operating current limits are set relatively low to avoid overloading the cells. The energy and power characteristics of the cells are not required to be particularly high; the primary focus is on cost-effectiveness.
The situation is different for power batteries. Within the limited space of a vehicle, the battery, which has been painstakingly installed, needs to be used to its fullest potential. Therefore, system parameters are set according to the battery's extreme limits, resulting in harsh operating conditions for the battery.
6. The two methods require different numbers of state parameters to be calculated.
Currently, there is no unified requirement for the State of Charge (SOC) parameters of energy storage systems, and it remains unclear what specific state parameter calculation capabilities an energy storage battery management system must possess. Furthermore, the application environment of energy storage batteries is relatively spacious and stable, making small deviations less noticeable within a large system. Therefore, the computational requirements of energy storage battery management systems are relatively lower than those of power battery management systems, and the corresponding management cost per string of batteries is also lower.
7. The passive balancing conditions are relatively good for energy storage battery management systems.
Energy storage power stations urgently require efficient balancing capabilities from their management systems. Energy storage battery modules are relatively large, with multiple batteries connected in series. Significant voltage differences between individual cells will cause a decrease in the overall capacity of the storage enclosure; the more batteries connected in series, the greater the capacity loss. From an economic efficiency perspective, adequate balancing is essential for energy storage power stations.
