After experiencing a series of ups and downs, my country's new energy vehicle industry is gradually maturing and stabilizing. It can be said that my country has entered the New Energy Vehicle 2.0 era, and compared to the 1.0 era, the industry as a whole is more mature.
Developing new energy vehicles is a consensus reached by countries around the world in response to the global focus on reducing carbon emissions and addressing climate change. Current automobiles, during their use, generate pollution, with hydrocarbons contributing to air pollution. In China, it is clearly stated that the future development will primarily focus on pure electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, and fuel cell vehicles.
In the era of New Energy Vehicles 2.0, the infrastructure for new energy vehicles will be gradually improved, and there will be a leapfrog improvement in core technologies. New energy vehicles will gradually replace traditional vehicles as the mainstream of the automotive industry, and will be on par with traditional vehicles in terms of cost and overall performance, or even have a higher cost-performance ratio. Policy intervention will decrease, and new energy vehicles, developing in accordance with market laws, will usher in a period of vigorous development with diverse players.
Technical aspects
In the era of new energy vehicles 2.0, the innovative development of core technologies will become extremely important, and battery core technology is related to the lifeline of my country's new energy vehicles.
The lack of core technologies in traditional gasoline-powered vehicles has long been a sore point for my country's automotive industry. However, the looming threat of a similar lack of core technologies in new energy vehicles is now becoming apparent. Without mastering core battery technologies, my country's new energy vehicle industry may repeat the mistakes of traditional automotive joint ventures.
The following is a summary of various technical aspects, including the development of our three current models both domestically and internationally, the development of key components, and the development of our energy-saving components.
Power batteries: R&D and industrialization of power batteries: Germany, the United States, China, Japan, and South Korea. Lithium-ion power battery production is currently mainly concentrated in China, Japan, and South Korea.
Japan remains technologically advanced; South Korea has surpassed Japan in market share, taking the top spot; China has the largest number of battery companies and the largest production capacity.
Key materials for power batteries: have been basically domestically produced; cell technology is at the same level as foreign countries; a relatively complete lithium-ion power battery industry chain system has been formed, and the formulation design, structural design and manufacturing process technology of power batteries have been mastered, and the production line is gradually transitioning from semi-automatic pilot production to fully automatic large-scale manufacturing; product uniformity and consistency, system integration technology and production automation level: need to catch up quickly.
Pure electric vehicles: In the past two years, there were more pure electric vehicle models abroad than in China. However, through the development of the past two or three years, the overall level of pure electric vehicles in China has developed very rapidly. Based on our estimates and budgets, the overall technological level is now comparable to that of foreign countries, with a development cycle shortened to approximately 2-3 years. The development cycle of domestic products may only be half a generation behind that of foreign products. Some performance aspects are also on par with foreign products, such as power performance, and there is a significant cost advantage.
At the same time, there are still gaps in key indicators and typical foreign models for pure electric vehicles. The next step is to focus on the improvement of electric vehicle technology in China or with government support.
For pure electric vehicles, the application of new integrated chassis, integrated intelligent technologies, and lightweight technologies will gradually increase in future models. According to a survey of foreign automakers by the Society of Automotive Engineers, the application of these technologies in next-generation products will increase significantly.
Pure electric commercial vehicles: China is undoubtedly at the forefront of the world in this regard, with unique energy supply technologies, an overall technological level that has reached international advanced levels, and internationally leading industrialization capabilities.
In terms of safety, breakthroughs have been made in key technologies such as protection of critical components, thermal management, and structural safety, solving safety and reliability issues such as water immersion safety.
Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: This type of vehicle received a lot of attention a few years ago. There are two types: plug-in and hybrid-based plug-in vehicles. Both use a dedicated hybrid engine and a highly efficient stroke gear. In addition, they are more difficult to control.
Fuel cell vehicles: In 2011, the China Society of Automotive Engineers conducted an evaluation and forecast of various vehicle models. Fuel cell vehicles were still in a small-scale demonstration stage. However, with the launch of industrialized models by major international automakers in the past two years, the technological progress of fuel cell vehicles has accelerated, and leading products have already achieved industrialization capabilities.
my country has made remarkable achievements in the production and sales of new energy vehicles, but has not yet achieved satisfactory results in mastering core technologies. To promote the development of core technologies for power batteries in my country, I would like to offer two suggestions.
First, the regulatory role of the "whitelist" for power batteries should be leveraged. While the "Industry Standard Conditions for Automotive Power Batteries" is not a mandatory standard, it should serve as an important reference, keeping substandard batteries out and thus helping to regulate my country's power battery market. Through the regulation of the "whitelist," companies can avoid interference from local protectionism and prevent them from considering issues solely from their own perspective, thereby promoting the development of core technologies for power batteries in my country.
Secondly, the role of the national power battery innovation platform should be leveraged. Domestic automakers are generally weaker and cannot independently develop batteries like Toyota and Volkswagen; therefore, collaborative research and development is an effective approach. I believe that support policies for automakers should take into account their contributions to the innovation platform. If the innovation platform can achieve significant technological breakthroughs, my country's core battery technology will not become hollowed out.
Battery core technologies are crucial to whether my country's new energy vehicle industry can catch up with leading automotive nations. Therefore, we must plan ahead and prevent the technology from becoming hollowed out.
For more information, please follow the Automotive Manufacturing Channel.
