1. Question: What are the challenges in non-standard automation design?
A: A solution. Only by understanding the product's characteristics and processing technology can a feasible and reliable implementation plan be proposed. Only under the guidance of the blueprint drawn by the designer can the project be implemented in an orderly manner and achieve the final results.
2. Question: What is the most important thing in non-standard automation design?
A: Nothing is unimportant. From the overall design plan to a single screw that won't tighten, every factor that affects the final acceptance is important.
3. Question: Which is better, a fixed positioning system or an adjustable mechanism?
A: We should firmly fix any positioning that can be fixed, and use positioning devices where necessary; we should concentrate the error, minimize the number of adjustable mechanisms, and avoid using multiple adjustable mechanisms to match each other to achieve the final debugging effect. The adjustment mechanism should have clear distinctions between coarse and fine adjustments.
4. Question: What issues should be considered in mechanical design?
A: Positioning
1) The positioning of the processing object is related to the determination of the overall blueprint and solves the customer's needs;
2) The docking and positioning between individual machines determines the reliability of the production line;
3) The location of a component within a standalone device determines the compatibility between functional modules;
4) The positioning of parts within an assembly determines the determinability of the mechanism's movements;
5) Clearly define the concepts of positioning and locking, avoid under-positioning and over-positioning;
6) Positioning addresses functional issues; meeting functional requirements is the premise of design.
Processability
1) Assembly processability: Can it be installed? Is it easy to assemble and disassemble?
2) Structural manufacturability: Is it easy to process while meeting the required precision? And if it can be processed, is it economical?
3) Machinability: Does the process flow meet the requirements for part precision, strength, and lifespan?
4) Technological issues address the question of how to do it;
Human-computer interaction
1) Is it easy to operate? Is it easy to observe the operation of the equipment? Is it easy to troubleshoot when the equipment malfunctions?
2) Is it convenient for equipment maintenance and repair?
3) Human-centered design addresses the question of how to do things better;
The design of the production line becomes less difficult when it is broken down step by step and the problems are finally addressed to each part and each dimension.
5. Question: How should we view the issue of theory versus practice?
A: Theory serves as a compass for practice. Failure to achieve theoretical results in practice often stems from inconsistencies in practical details. Therefore, meticulous attention to every detail is crucial. While it's undeniable that some theoretical foundations are incomplete, leading to unexpected errors, perfecting theoretical knowledge is essential. Optimizing theoretical requirements ensures the final structure closely matches the theoretical outcome. Adhere to what you believe to be correct as a guiding principle and avoid easily dismissing theories. If, after practical testing, the gap between theory and practice becomes too large, dare to challenge yourself and establish a new theoretical framework, for practice is the sole criterion for testing theory.
Disclaimer: This article is a reprint. If it involves copyright issues, please contact us promptly for deletion (QQ: 2737591964 ) . We apologize for any inconvenience.
